14. MODERN TIMES

What does Allah has to do with it?..

 It is proved by science!..

From the dispute of two Muslims.

Over three thousand years of N/C activities are revealed at the present stage by the splitting of public opinion into two polar camps: adherents of the Biblical idea that the world was created by someone alive and reasonable on the one side and the evolution theory adepts – on the other side. The growing authority of the science and its new discoveries attract more and more favorers to this theory. But many people wishing to have only correct answers for any arising questions are not satisfied with the science unable to answer many of them. And if so then the authority of science falls in the eyes of these people and they do not know that the science is only a child just learning to walk. Nevertheless, some people learned to use its authority for making profit. So what will become when the science will firmly stand on its feet? Then the fans of the authoritarian approach to the percepted information would feel much less self-assured. They will have to unpile everything themselves.

To my mind the Near East at present is the most serious bastion of the symbolic authoritarism since the whole authority belongs to the language symbol “Allah” (God).

The believers are unaware that this symbol conceals not that what they are imagining and caliphs et al. use this authority for ruling purposes: some for profit motive, some  without it. Living in the Middle East it had been dangerous to oppose this authoritarism 3,000 years ago and still the more now – when the number of its adepts increased.

Owing to the development of the means of communications and mass media the spirit of civilization commenced to penetrate into Islamic society. Therefore there appeared among the faithful Muslims many fighters against democratic freedoms of the Western society. Their artificial introduction meets violent resistance of Islamic fundamentalists. The events of the last three years support this assertion.

And the contemporary Islamic warrior does not look like either Spartan hoplite, or samurai, or an American soldier. To my mind he is an ill-educated man of low intellect, ground down by poverty, and yearning to reach the heaven as soon as possible to get rid of sufferings of this life.  

  During last time, the Middle East is considered to be the most conflictive region. Though the three religions born in this region practice latria, they themselves are split into different religious confessions.

  The most close-knit of them seems to be Judaism with “selectness of the Jewish people” as a basis for integrity.  

  Christianity is the most peaceful and most split into confessions. Islam is the most aggressive and also rather split.

  And as a consequence, the most long-lasting and bloody conflict at present takes place between Judaism and Islam. Both religions are well-rooted in the Middle East. And though Muslims outnumber Israelites, the latter by the right of the elder brother appropriate little by little the lands of the younger brother and both scarcely tolerate the middle brother standing there with one foot only but the other being over almost half of the world. Peacefulness turned out to be the most suitable weapon for conquering new lands.

   And though the texts of the Old Testament and Quran contain records that might be used to support and acquit natural human aggressiveness, the believers could have forgotten these lines but for constant  competition between the beliers themselves. They all wish to be closer to the God, and a part of them, that at Jesus’s time was named Pharisees and Scribers, is constantly scrutinizing the holy books. By words of Juan Matus, “all their forces are consumed by primary attention”. They are unable to pray well, to get in contact with N/C and become prophets, at least for a while. But they see it happen to the others. They often hear that God lights fire, comes as a cloud. Or appears in somebody’s dreams; and, urged by their self-importance feeling they reread sacred books to become closer to the God to find out how to act to become a genuine believer and purport to diligently teach to behave the others.  

  I think that the tragic events on September 11 in the USA, terrorist acts in Russia, destruction of ancient Buddha statues, etc. are the results of activities of that very category of people. These are the consequences of the Islamic Pharisees acts.

  The fair question arises. What urges of N/C reflected in the scriptures of the three Middle East religions have led to this modern situation in the world? 

  Hebrew.

  A Hebrew, in relation to the non-believer moreover of other nation, had tight to make him a slave, to kill, to deceive. Such relation had been cultivated from Exodus to Joshua. 

  Christian.

  Fesus himself gave no advices but his disciples being unpopular among their own people turned to evangelization of the pagans, i.e. non-believers. And now the Christianity of different confessions are aimed at turning people into their faith.

   Muslim.

   According to Quran having met an unfaithful a Muslim must cut off his head if he does not accept one God, i.e. Allah. That is the way they have been acting in VI-X centuries until nowadays. Now, of course, it is not so gloomy; many Muslims are kind and not aggressive; meeting the unfaithful they do not search for a sword but try to act as missioners and are glad when they succeed. As to those aggressive, many of them would be happy to die to contribute to the glory of Allah! So what is happiness to them is a woe for New York and Moscow.

As to the present day situation for N/C proper (Jehovah), he keeps some of his promises until now: “I will return to Jerusalem, my holy city, and live there. It will be known as the faithful city, and the hill of the Lord Almighty will be called the sacred hill” (Zachariah 8). So anyone who wish to know in details of his (N/C) well-being are welcome to appear in person at the above address. The communication, however will be telepathic in the language of emotions, in case one manages to attract his attention. And then a new Prophet foretold by Nostradamus will appear.  

Anton Zavolzhskiy 

E-mail antonzavol@yandex.ru

13. BATTLE DRAGON

He spreading of monotheism over the Earth began more than 3,000 years ago. If N/C had not helped believers in wars we would hardly hear even such word as monotheism. And the language symbol of “God” would have attained quite different meaning. Following Darwin’s theory the man on earth evolutioned as a gregarious predator and possess all its qualities: struggling for territory, prey, female, and position in hierarchy. All the history of mankind may serve an illustration to it. Humanity is waging wars as long as it remembers itself. The clans, tribes, states has always been warring between themselves. People robbed each other in very different ways, seizing possessions and valuables, subduing each other, making them slaves, arranging upheavals. Peace treaties, laws, and moral standards could not withstand attack of animal instincts and are violated under some plausible excuse and often without any excuse. Human reason in this case is completely subjected to animal passions.

N/C acting in such conditions in order to implement his programs had only to “replant” “the tree of Israel” rooted by him in Egypt. To meet this goal Moses not only demonstrated predictive signs but also promised them land: “I will bring you to the land that I solemnly promised to give to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: and I will give it to you as your own possession. I am the LORD” (Exodus 6). In his Pentateuch Moses many times colorfully paints the merits of the promised lands speculating on territorial instinct of his tribesmen. But the lands promised to Israelites had been populated with tribes used to periodic wars whereas Israelites propagated under favorable conditions in Egypt were not able to wage war and were afraid of conflict situations. Therefore N/C had not only to lead them via Moses and succeeding prophets, but also to participate in hostilities himself supporting by bio-energy one side and crushing the others. All conflict situations arising between Israelites and other peoples without his support had been solved not in favor of Israelites. And vice versa, when he rendered them support they took over their opponents.

“Don’t go. The Lord is not with you , and your enemies will defeat you. When you face the  the Amalekites and the Canaanites, you will die in battle; the Lord will not be with you because you have refused to follow him. Yet they still dared to go up into the hill country, even though neither the Lord’s Covenant Box nor Moses left the camp. Then he Amalekites and the Canaanites who lived there attacked and defeated them and pursued them as far as Hormah” (Numbers 14).

Similar situations occurred afterward both with Israelites and Muslims. As to the cases when the believers won, and it should be admitted that there was majority of them, the battles were preceded by prayers and magical ceremonies. The people that conducted them, to my mind, contacted N/C because they won victories even being in minority.

“’O Lord, you can help a weak army as easily as a powerful one. Help us now, O Lord our God, because we are relying on you, and in your name we have come out to fight agaist this huge army. Lord, you are our God; no one can hope to defeat you’. The Lord defeated the Sudanese army when Asha and the Judean army attacked them. They fled…" (2 Chronicles 14).

It is evident that for ancient Israelites the help of their God was something natural, like calls over cellular phone for a contemporary man. All the descriptions of the battles in the Old Testament are very scanty. Really, who would colorfully describe in details a telephone call? Therefore, and probably due to insufficient quantity of language notions in ancient Hebrew I have not found anything worth mentioning in this respect. What impresses is the multitude of times the help was rendered, rituals prior to battles, and the thing named “obeah”. If the pagans in case of victory of one tribe over the other had a habit of robbing the loosers, then the Israelites after conquering the promised lands destroyed everything live, burnt the property, and destructed dwellings as urged by  N/C. I think that such behavior of Israelites was the result of either telepathic transmission of N/C’s own hatred to these peoples, or suggestion in order to prevent infection by “myths” via property and cult objects of these people.

Nevertheless, the Old Testament description of the events probably due to scanty language is not trustworthy for contemporary man even if he possesses vast volume of knowledge. ”So the priests blew the trumpets. As soon as the men heard it, they gave a loud shout, and the walls collapsed. Then all the army went strait up the hill into the city and captured it. With their swords they killed everyone in the city, men and women, young and old. They also killed cattle, sheep, and donkeys“ (Joshua 6).

Nobody recorded the evidence of the witnesses of the battle either from this, or that side. Nevertheless, while reading the Bible I have imagined aleady approximately the character of impact of N/C on Israelites’ opponents, as well as that he was capable of changing the characteristics of his impact (emission parameters) in different cases.

To my mind, it was his constant help to Israelites in wars that finally led to condition when they became meaningless as warriors that together with their other qualities by the beginning of our era ceased to suit N/C. Such relations of N/C with his “chosen” people had led to Judea becoming a Roman province, destruction of the Lord of Sabaoth Temple, and termination of offerings.

But some 500 years later the first Muslims after the death of their Prophet decided to record and systematize the events preceding emergence of Islam and to describe the life of the Prophet. Ibn Hisham, a faithful Muslim, undertook this enterprise and took for a basis the book of Ibn Iskhak, also a Muslim. But, though strange it is, their approaches to gathering and submitting the information resembled me much of those of Gerodote whom some scholars call the father of history (meaning history as a science). Evidently they all tried not to introduce anything personal. In order to allow he reader making his own estimations, they often they often give two or even three evidences of the same event. Thanks to such approach I managed to find something interesting.

Of course, the Muslims under the guidance of Mohammed waged many wars and before each battle the Prophet prayed to Allah to grant him victory over the “unfaithful”. If the data quoted by Ibn Hisham are veritable, the number of Muslims entering the battle had been always 3-4 times less the number of his enemy and, nevertheless, they always won. And in the most significant for the Muslims Battle of Bardo this was the case too. It is about this battle that Hisham gives multiple evidence of different people. But in most cases the imprinted perception “saw” a number of Angels. However, some people marked out unusual condition of their enemies. Thus, e.g. Ibn Salma in response to congratulations after the battle said: “What are you congratulating us with? By Lord, we met bald creakers like camels tied together and led to Mecca to be cut. And we have cut them”.

From the other side Abu Sufian having returned after defeat to Mecca told the following: “By Lord, as soon as we met then we started to flee from them and they started to kill us as they wished, take us captives as they wished. By Allah, in spite of all this I do not condemn our people! We had been attacked by white people on dappled horses flying over air. By Lord, nobody could have resisted them” (chapter “Trophies and captives”).

Analyzing the above-stated I would say that the tribe from Mecca that had lost the battle experienced strong fear induced by N/C but people that had died in this battle were killed not only by swords.

Together with one of my nephews I went up the mountain leading to the Bard valley. We had been both pagans and were waiting for the outcome of the battle to join the winners in looting the loosers. When we were standing on that mountain a cloud suddenly appeared and covered us. We heard horses’ whinnying from it. I heard someone cried out: “Forward, Haizum!” My nephew had a heart attack from fear, and he died instantly. I also almost died of fear but then held myself” (chapter "The Prophet straightens his ranks").

I think that from this very cloud the Apostles heard: “This is my beloved son” and there is nothing particular in that having met such cloud people became Jews, Christians, Muslims and converted others in their faith.

“When the ally captures you, you either die of heart attach, or commence to struggle with him”. These words of Juan Matus are also related to N/C but of much lower level than that “dwelling” in the Middle East. The last one can simultaneously impact huge amounts of people. Thus, believing to Prophet Isaiah, the Assyrian troops lost 185,000 men only through the impact of N/C without any other interference.  Likewise without any other interference Ethiopian troops (Christian at that time) parished that came under the guidance of king Abharat to destroy Caaba. So, gentlemen believers and atheists, this is not some poltergeist in collision with which a man with stable primary attention experiences something like cold wind whiff, nothing more

To my mind, the Battle of Mount Uhud was a very interesting battle of Mohammed’s comrades-in-arms with same Meccanians. The Muslims were seven hundred in number and Kuraishites were three thousand. Having attacked the Muslims soon broke their defense line and penetrated into enemy’s camp. And here primary attention of our Muslims rendered them poor service: having seen Meccanian treasures they commenced robbing and their battle rage cooled down. And probably they lost some connection with N/C, or may be he just got lost and could not decide on whom he should influence. This was the only battle under guidance of the Prophet which was lost by the Muslims and even Mohammed caught a stone by his teeth.

Owing to constant assistance of N/C rendered to his Prophet and his troops the Muslims lost prudence and were trapped in the battle with Havazin tribe. Havazinites attacked them from three sides and Mohammed’s troops started to flee. He could hardly gather a hundred men around him. Approximately at that moment help from N/C came. Jubaira Ibn Mutima described it so: “When people were fighting , before the flee of Havazinites, I saw something likestriped cloth descended from the skies and fell between us and Havazinites. I saw black ants crawling over the valley and filling it. I do not doubt that these were angels. After that the enevitable defeat of Havazinites occurred (“The expedition to Hunain valley”).

That was the way a man seeing N/C attack described it. As to angels, the self-preservation instinct prompted him to insert the word not to be a white crow among the faithful with the imprinted perception who either saw nothing, or saw what their belief allowed.  I tend to trust for several reasons the above witnesses collected by Ibn Hisham: first, in each case they are united by peculiar explanation of meeting something extraordinary; second, when people describe purposeful fantasies as a rule they do it on the basis something earlier percepted or heard of. Third, when people tend to deceive somebody, they use the information habitual for the “description of the world” of those to be deceived.

After Mohammed’s death the victorious spread of Islam continued. But the further, the less aid from N/C was required. Muslim’s religious fanaticism became sufficient.

Many people dealing with the history of Islam have been wondering how Muslims almost always won even being in minority though they had no better arms, nor special line of battle. August Muller said that the victories were based on religious fanaticism, greed for gain, rigid discipline, and bravery of Arabs. But he, himself, in the chapter “Conquests of Islam” describes the cases when the Arabs demonstrated far from the best qualities: they fled from the enemy to very Medina, they jumped into the river and got drowned in it whereas the Persians under the same conditions threw themselves at the Muslims and all perished. Muslims’ victory came very expensive to them.  As to the first battles, then the Arabs fought the Arabs and the winners were those who were with the Prophet. Of course, each man explains everything basing on his own “description of the world” therefore many experts ascribe unusual bravery to the Arabs, even my compatriot Lev Gumilev among them. To my mind, this bravery is based on empty stomach and belief in the promised heaven. Therefore conquests of Islam periodically extended outside the reach of our N/C and returned to it, for outside these borders only human factor was decisive.

12. MOHAMMED AND HIS BOOK

By V c. AD the center of the Arabian peninsular was mainly inhabited by Arabian pagan tribes, inconsiderable in number tribes that adopted Christianity, and tribal lifestyle Israelites. At the territories occupied by Byzantine Empire the process of pass over from paganism to Christianity was finalizing. No trace remained from the Israeli Kingdom. The Temple was destroyed and on its place the Romans built their own one with completely different ceremonies.

As to the life of Israeli tribes, the main thing they had acquired from the Bible was that they were “chosen people”. Ibn Hisham mentions their haughtiness and in practice they concluded treaties with pagans resulting in wars with each other and violation of the basic commandment intended for them “do not kill”. As to sacrifices, there was no Temple and sacrifices ouside the temples “in the hills and in groves” had been forbidden to them by N/C via prophets. The time came for the creation of the new “chosen people” and with regard to the mistakes of the past N/C stakes on a strong personality.

Sao what is so strong in Mohammed’s personality? All tyrants and conquerors known to me had similar events in childhood: they became orphans due to death of one or both parents. Psychologists say that due to absence of parents a power complex developed in them, but I think that the primary cause was their receiving of bio-ether heritage from their parents at the moment of death that gave them an advantage over ordinary people and further basing on this heritage a certain type of character was formed. Among historical personages such were: Chengiz Khan, Ivan the Terrible, Peter I, Hitler, Stalin, et al.  And many other people that became rulers and formally had fathers only because their pregnant mothers hasted to marry having learned about their lovers’ deaths. So if the N/C perception system allowed him to differentiate firstlings from the others, he could also “see” such people having a differing bio-ether component. In connection with the above-said it should be mentioned that Mohammed’s father died before his birth and mother – when he was six and he was brought up by grandfather. In his life he revealed himself as a real tyrant. With the aid of his comrades he killed everybody who hurt him even in childhood and even by words. His companions often committed murders upon his request. His own bio-energy pressure was such that he could easily subdue other people like other tyrants, but N/C had subdued him and he conducted though cruelly like tyrant his “doctrine” that became the bases for such book as Quran . Probably if the Ark and the Tabernacle had been preserved his contacts with N/C would be different from what Mohammed’s wife Aisha described: “The Prophet was still sitting with us and here the thing happened that was usually happening when he had revelations. He was covered and they put a leather pillow under his head. Having seen this I was not afraid or worried. I knew that I was pure before him and that Allah would protect me. And my parents, I swear by Him who holds Aisha’s life, had not yet collected their faculties since the Prophet came: they feared that Allah woul confirm what people said; the Prophet came to his senses and sat; big droplets of sweat were running over his forehead like pearls though the day was not hot”. Some people that got acquainted with this story of Aisha made a conclusion that he had epileptic attacks, but I do not think so because I have seen myself very similar state of “extrasensory contactors”. Apart from it, the Prophet’s ration contained much meat that, as is known, does not promote sensitive capabilities and, most likely, he was difficult to contact with for N/C. In the description of the Prophet’s life there are fact supporting it as compared with the life of Jesus Christ; Jesus prior to his custody had easy contact with N/C, and Mohammed’s contacts were a bit groggy. But he won at the expense of personal qualities inherent to many historical “tyrants” and it resulted in creation of mighty Islamic community. In which in his lifetime he was a King and a Prophet. Such man in the process of struggling for the cause of Allah gave advices and instructions, commented on the Old and New Testaments, remarked on life and death in general, and on specific life situations. Probably he himself made notes, or maybe someone else but after his death. These notes are united in the book named Quran.

I had an impression after reading Quran that somebody wishes to staff my reason with conventionalities or better say to form my mentality by imprinting perception during its reading in order to make a ‘zombi’ of me.

To my mind it may be supposed that such style of the Prophet’s utterances and of the book itself appears due to the wish of N/C though the character or to be more exact style of Mohammed’s communication with his tribesmen might have played the decisive role.

In Quran there are 114 suras  each of which opens with words “In the name of Allah, most gracious, most merciful”. Apart from it the text contains utterances on mercifulness of Allah: “Merciful, He established himself on throne” (sura Ta-Ha Ayat 4) or “ReallyAllah is lenient to you, merciful”(sura “Iron” Ayat 9). It is due to such quantitative impact on consciousness that zombifying of the readers in several directions occur. Most important of them is the creation of the ultimate authority for God. Therefore in the text of Quran Allah is glorified 294 times by different utterances: “didn’t you see that Allahcreated the skies and earth in truth”; ”if he wisheshe will take you away and bring back new creation”(sura “Ibrahim”Ayat 22) or “Allah is he created seven universes and the same number of earths. The commands flow among them. This is to let you know that Allah is Omnipotent, and that Allah is fully aware of all things”.

It is necessary to mention that Mohammed in a certain extent was familiar with Pentateuch and Gospel, but analyzing all his sayings one gets impression that he knew Genesis and Exodus pretty well and had superfluous impression of the rest of the Bible. And he liked the moment of exodus very much. Thus Qurane mentions the story of Moses struggling with Pharaoh in different variations 58 times.

"We sent Musa with our tokens and evident power to Firaun and Haman and Karun. And they said: “Wizard, liar”. When he came to them with Truth from us they said: “Kill the sons of those who believed with him and leave their wives alive!” But intrigues of non-believers lie in aberration!

And Firaun said: “Leave me, I shall kill Musa and let him call his Lord; I am afraid that he will change our religion or will find impurity on land!"

And said Musa: “I appeal to my Lord and your Lord against everybody glorifying who does not believ in the day of settlement!”

And said a believer of the Firaun decent who concealed his belief: “Would you kill a man for saying “Allah is my Lord!” and came to you with clear tokens from your Lord? If he is liar his lie will turn against him, if he says truth then you will be reached by everything he promises. Really Allah do not lead those who are excessive and who lies!” sura “Believer” Ayats 24-29).

Mohammed mentions Jesus Christ mainly in sura “Imran’s Family”. His last words said on behalf of Allah are: “He is only a slave to whom we granted graciousness and made him an example for the sons of Israel” (sura “Decorations” ayat 59). The next important impact on consciousness is creation of assurance that the real long life begins after death and it will depend on the extent of faith in Allah.

 Thus intimidations by the punishment after death are met 187 times. “Those who believe in Allah and his Messangers, i.e. zaddiks and confessors, will face their Lord: the will have their award and their light. And those remaining in infidelity and regarding our tokens as false will dwell in hell flames” (sura “Iron” ayat 18) or “As for those who disbelieve and reject our revelations, they are the dwellers of the Hellfire; they abide therein forever. What a miserable destiny!!” sura “Mutual blaming” ayat 10).

Likewise the remarks on heaven intended for all believers are also often met in Quran text (86 times). “Enter heaven, you, your wives will be soothed! They will be brought golden dished and cups containing everything their souls wish and that gladden their eyes. And that will last forever for you! (sura “Decorations” ayats 70, 71 or “There is a place of saving for god-fearing people, gardens and vineyards and full-breasted girls of same age, and full cup! They will not hear chattering there or accusation in lies (sura “News”ayat 31).

It resembles me such a thick bait that even hook is invisible.

I did not commence calculations on other directions of impacts of the book. I  may only say that the next important direction is fearing the God. “Oh, people, fear your Lord! The shatter of the last hour is a great thing” (sura “Huj” ayat 1). Next we may place good relations between Muslims. 

And the last direction of impact on consciousness is related to the wish of N/C and its conductor to increase the number of believing Muslims by simple but rough measures: “Killed be  an unfaithful man!” (sura “He frowned” ayat 16 [different from English version –Translator’s remark]). “And when you meet those who did not believe then strike sword over neck; and after great battering – strengthen your ties “ (sura “Muhammad” ayat 4 [official English version: If you encounter (in war) those who disbelieve, you may strike the necks. If you take them as captives you may set them free or ransom them, until the war ends. Had GOD willed, He could have granted you victory, without war.  But He thus tests you by one another. As for those who get killed in the cause of GOD, He will never put their sacrifice to waste - Translator’s remark]). Quran has no instructions what to do with the unfaithful accepting Allah during the war but Ibn Hisham mentions couple of cases when Mohammed reprehended his comrades-in-arms for killing people when those accepted Allah for saving their lives. It may be supposed from this that Sunnite Muslims must be kinder than Shiite Muslims.

Thus during the rule of Mohammed any settlement, tribe or man could save themselves from destruction and death by agreeing to accept Islam. As a rule Mohammed prior to siege sent parliamentories calling to accept Islam and recognize Mohammed as a Prophet.

And preparing his comrades-in-arms for the battle he said: “Really Allah has bought souls and belongings of the believers in exchange for heaven! They struggle on the route to Allah, they kill and get killed as promised by Him in Torah, Gospel, and Quran. Who is more faithful in his behest than Allah? Be glad for your trade you have bargained with him! This is great success! (sura “Penance [?]”ayat 112).

Such persuadings and instructions are of course not so often met as calls to fear Allah but they also contain elements of intimidation apart from promises of heaven: “O you who believe, if you encounter the disbelievers who have mobilized against you, do not turn back and flee. Anyone who turns back on that day, except to carry out a battle plan, or to join his group, has incurred wrath from GOD, and his abode is Hell; what a miserable destiny!” (sura «The spoils of war”, 15,16).

Quran has sufficient number of such sayings to leave a noticeable trace in reader’s consciousness.   

But it should be noted that during lifetime Mohammed was not able to create mentality of fearless warriors among his comrades-in-arms but there were separate cases of self-sacrifices among Muslims even then. An illustration to this may be found in “Expedition to Muta” described by Ibn Hisham. Of course 3,000 detachment of Muslims was less stubborn than famous 300 men of Sparta, but it is 1,400 years that Quran text influences readers and Islam achievements support it. Therefore there are more than necessary “kamikaze” among Muslims. Faith in heaven and semi-hungry existence trigger it.

The above-enumerated directions of impact on consciousness occupy about 70% of Quran text and the remaining 30% are interpretations of the Bible and rules of behavior for the believers almost for all life occasions and if they do not fit, then Torah would do. Almost all rules are mentioned only once with few exceptions. As far as I remember two times are mentioned only the issue of sharing heritage and strong recommendation for women to conceal their charms and decorations.

As to his retelling Biblical and Gospel stories, evidently he liked to clarify them to his comrades. Some of my acquaintances are feared and amazed by the fact that Islam rooted then and strengthened with time. To my mind, this happened due to the fact that Mohammed did not introduce any innovations in lifestyle of Arabs except for monotheism. He fixed or reoriented other peculiarities of their way of life by his sayings. If earlier the Arabs robbed, killed, held each other to ransom, he allowed to do it only in respect of the unfaithful what the Muslims are going on to do right now. If earlier they had polygamy and a woman had lower social status than men he fixed it in Quran.

The spreading of Islam was assisted by absence of the idea of selectedness inherent to Judaism mentality. Yet Mohammed could not abstain from some racism and gave preference to “the big black eyes”.

" The righteous will be in a secure position enjoying gardens and springs wearing velvet and satin; close to each other. We grant them wonderful spouses with big black eyes [eyes, their size, and color are not mentioned in English version – Translators remark] (sura “Smoke” ayat 51). Last words in other [Russian] translation are substituted by “big eyes”.

A very exact characteristic to the Quran in whole as a book was given by a German historian August Muller: “We see Quran as a chaotic pile of abstracts having no connection so it is virtually impossible to read to the end at least one page”.

Yes, certainly the readers that are used to follow the movement of somebody’s thoughts or development of the plot are in devilish pains to read Quran.

So anybody who wishes to understand Muslim behavior should at least once read Quran remembering that this book is 1,400 years old and generation after generation consume it with mother’s milk. The faithful Muslims can hardly boast of diversified education because this book (Quran) produced specific impact on its adepts. To my mind it has rigidly dogmatized human consciousness making it authoritarian one. It resulted (due to no need in it) in the decrease of intellectual level since this book makes people act as prescribed in all cases. The necessity to think simply vanished in believers. Contemporary condition of science-consuming technical production in the Middle East supports this assertion.

More than a hundred years ago August Muller wrote evidently wishing to warn simple-minded and incurious Christian politics: “Only those who are unaware that the basic foundations of Muslim state law constitute sacred religious norm of Islam may believe in ability of true equality of people of other religions within Muslim sovereignty. Futile are expectations to change this order with aid of institutes borrowed from the West. Any faithful [Muslim]would turn away with a shrug from any distortion of its basic laws. All these “treaties” and “constitutions”that had been fooled out by more egocentric than enlightened diplomacy wishing to make [Muslims] happy against their wish are not worth the sheet of paper on which they were written “.

So at the end of this chapter I would recommend all the interested people “to enlighten themselves” in Islamic issues.

11. THE CODE OFD SEXUAL RELATIONS

In pre-Christian time at the territory of contemporary European countries there existed more free sexual relations than now. And, as a rule, they were of specific type for each ethnic or tribal group. In many aspects they took into account the peculiarities of human nature but sometimes they contradicted it and sometimes they altered. But in Christian times all ancient legends passed the censorship of the “Holy” inquisition and almost no written evidences on how family relations were arranged have reached us.

 Contemporary science regards the two-gender system of reproduction as more evolutionally adaptive than on-gender one. Each gender at that has its own function.

Womankind bears conservative functions, and mankind – democratic ones in broadest sense of these terms. 

Womankind tends to preserve all genetic data already contained in genes plus newly acquired from mankind. Therefore women possess higher stability and prudence in behavior, more stable health and lack of inclination to risk incidental to all normal men. Though more men are born than women, approximately by 26 the number equals, and later the proportion changes in favor of women.  And if drug addicts, alcoholics, etc. are signed off from reproducible agents then the proportion of men and women capable of reproduction and normal family life aged around 40 is something like one to tree (1:3). Therefore in different countries there are different customs compensating this quantitative disproportion between sexes; e.g. in Japan it led to free women becoming “geishas” In Chinese literature there are mentionings about concubines spread even among peasants.

In India Brahmans do not have right to refuse a woman wishing to have a child and in Christian countries it is so-called ‘double morals” (when it is allowable for a man to have additional sexual contacts but not allowable for a woman).

Sexual relations recommendations from Jehovah are tangentially mentioned both in Old and New Testaments and only in Qur’an they are described for the evident purpose.

In the times of the prophet Moses Israelites were simple people without “high spiritual morals” and each male could have as many females as he could afford: wives, concubines, slaves. E.g. Moses himself being married to his sister Miriam married a Cushite resulting with a quarrel with Miriam and Aaron (Numbers 12).

The only thing introduced for the accelerated reproduction was circumcisionIt was introduced even before the settlement of Jews in Egypt.

As to other commandments to Israelites on sexual issues, they are related to:

1.                      Marriage and virginity (Deuteronomy 22, 13).

2.                      Marriage with the deaseased man’s brother (Deuteronomy – 25, 5).

3.                      Not to deprive Jewish women of concubination even if hey are not wives but slaves (Exodus 21, 7).

The care that every Jewish women capable of giving birth should have such possibility is slightly noticeable in this behest.

As to Jesus Christ it is possible to say that he had almost omitted this issue except one saying – “A man will unite with his wife and the two will become one”. Instead of him Apostle Paul succeeded in recommendations on this issue. He, himself, was an unmarried Pharisee, an oppressor of Christianity, and some time after crucifixion of Christ he sharply changed his religious position and was so active that became the founder of main Christian traditions: first he abandons circumcision for Christians (Philippians 3), gives recommendations as to family relations (Ephesians 4) instructs on episcopate (Timothy 3, Titus 1) and when unable to advise – recommends “Be like me”, i.e. single.

In the result of the morals inculcated by him in the countries that adopted Christianity as a defense reaction there appeared “double moral” and sexual revolutions burst out from time to time.

I don’t know how but our N/C “saw” that something wrong was happening around and after six hundred years he decided arrange order in sexual issue via prophet Mohammed. Mohammed worded his instructions scattered all over Qur’an. The first of them refer to menses problems: he strongly recommends not to touch women until thy are purified (ayat 222), then (ayat 223) he says: “Your wives are arable lands for you, go to your land whenever you wish to…” Then follows instructions on divorces where he advises women not to conceal their pregnancy in divorce (ayat 226). After the divorce a woman has right to leave with all the property that was presented to her (ayat 229).

After the final divorce i.e. third one, a faithful Muslim has right to remarry the same woman only after she had been married to someone else (ayat 230). By ayat 232 Mohammed forbids former husbands to hinder marriages of their ex-wives and in ayat 232 he recommends to feed babies by breast until they are two years old.

Then follows instructions owing to which each Muslim woman has right to leave her husband if he had stopped to have sexual intercourse with her. She must only wait no less than four months.  (ayat 234): “And those of you who would calm down and abandon their wives[mind] that they will wait four months…”

There is impression in all civilized countries that all Muslims support their wives materially, but Qur’an does not contain any reasons for which a woman may leave her husband, be it battery or isufficient nourishing, excluding solely the example given above. In all other cases a man decides whether he would agree to divorce his wife.

In ayats 237-238 material problems of divorce are dwelt with.

In sura “Women” (ayat 3) Mohammed gives such advice: “marry those that are pleasant to you  two, three, four, and if you are afraid you would not be fair – then one only.”

Owing to this very record in Qur’an, a rule not to have more than four wives established in the Middle East. And ayat 27 prescribes  which exactly women are allowable for a Muslim:

“forbidden for you are your mothers, and your sisters, and you aunts by father and by mother, and brother’s daughters, and breast-milk sister’s daughter, and your wives’ mothers, and your foster-daughters from your wives to whom you have already entered; if you have not entered to them – there is no sin on you; and wives of sons of your loins; and uniting of two sisters if it was not before”. Really Allah is forgiving and merciful. And ayat 29 recommends to marry faithful slaves.

Of course, Ancient Rome pagans had incest forbidden but generally at the level of sub-consciousness normal people abstained from inter-relative relations and only aristocracy of medieval Europe in order to preserve its wealth and territories dared to marry their cousins.

However, looking at this problem from the other side and believing prophet Moses at the initial stage of “breeding” of the Jewish race arch-fathers of Jewish people Abraham, Jacob, and Moses himself had been married to their sisters. It is most likely common Israelites often followed their example. Such inter-relative relations are often used in cattle-breeding to upgrade some peculiarities of the breed but it is not practiced on later stages. In this connection the above Ayat 27 may be compared with Ayat 49: “Oh, Prophet, we allowed you as your wives those whom you paid their due and those you received as trophy and the daughters of the uncle on father’s side, and the daughters of the uncle on mother’s side, the daughters of the aunt on mother’s side that settled with you, and a woman-believer that offered her to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to marry her – solely for himself apart from believers.” 

As is obvious from the above ayat its directions take off some prohibitions of Ayat 27 and allow the Prophet to marry cousins upbreeding genetic peculiarities of the Prophet in descendants. I suppose that that was the way N/C planned to secure sufficient number of people easily yielding to his hypnoses. This would be the case but for Islamic “Pharisees” wishing to dogmatize Quran, in the result of which h\further Prophets were difficult to proclaim themselves prophets.

 Additionally in Islamic traditions intended for believers’ reproduction alongside with circumcision for men veils (paranja) for women was introduced.

For a woman to conceal her appearance could only he who evidently saw sexual agitation of a male looking at female and observed mass of frustrated sexual energy when a woman is unreachable. With the introduction of veils the situation improved – men became sexually agitated on seeing their wives and not in the streets. Situations leading to quarrels between the believers decreased.

The first instruction for veil introduction was given in Ayat 61: “Oh, Prophet, tell your wives, daughters, and believers’ women that they should wear their veils” The second saying of Mohammed on this subject is: “Oh, Prophet, tell believers’ women that they should lower their eyes and preserve their limbs and do not show their adornments save those openly seen, let them cover by their veils the cuts on breast, and do not show their adornments save only to their husbands, or their fathers, or their husbands’ fathers, or their brothers, or sons of their brothers, or their women, or those they put their hands on, or male servants not possessing wish, or children not understanding  woman’s nudity”. 

To finish this topic I’d wish to quote one more saying (sura “Light” Ayat 59): “And elderly women not hoping for marriage, they have no sin in taking off clothes; not boasting their adornments and being restrained is the best for them”.

Of course appearance of an elderly woman would hardly cause any man’s sexual agitation and it is allowable not to wear a veil but, like elderly Western women strongly use makeup and wear wigs, elderly Muslim women do not wish to take off a veil to seem younger.

I think that Quran lines quoted in this chapter may be commented as follows: no other peoples in the world have rules more adapted for the accelerated reproduction than faithful Muslims; and it is good that not all Muslims observe the so strictly, otherwise each Muslim woman would give birth to a child every 2-4 years, i.e. she would have 10 and more children by the end of her life, that is supported by the fact that terrorist no.1 Usama bin Laden has 53 brothers and sisters. I think that none of the representatives of the “civilized” world could boast so many relatives, but a number of his coreligionists could.

It is not difficult to foretell that should these rules be observed by all mankind then the whole Earth would be just “eaten” in some hundred years

But, to the good luck of the Earth, the population of the “civilized” countries does not reproduce itself and gradually decreases; and with transparent borders there exists a real threat of slow gradual Islamization of the whole civilized world with all consequences ensuing. In the result the question rises on its own: is the “Supreme” possessing enough knowledge about the planet of Earth, or people have acquired more knowledge?

10. PAGAN’S GOSPEL

  In conformity with Karl Marx by the beginning of our era the Israeli society dissipated into the rich and the poor and this dissipation got stabilized despite the behests of Moses proclaiming brotherhood among the Jews.

  Scribers and Pharisees managed to monopolize the right for truth. They increased punishment of their brothers for non-execution of rituals, more rarely forgave debts, and so on and so forth. In the result the illiterate part of Jewry being unable to read and do not having the books of covenant on hands became trampled by more literate and richer tribesmen. This changed the emotional background in the society. If earlier King David sang, rejoiced, and danced before the Lord and when necessary could appeal to him (the same was practiced by the whole society), then now the fed self-assured leaders of society could not even make correct prayers. They became emotionally impotent; and from the other side, the suppressed people appealed to God emanating their energy of frustration.

  Of course, such emotional background did not suit our N/C who kept his promises to live among the Israelites until then. So then he takes decision to grow from among them a man who would be his best conductor to make the Jewish society realize wrongfulness of the created situation and would try to make it right and return to the condition when all Israelites lived as a harmonious community. After the boy grew up and became a man he, like Moses, was taken for forty days but not to the mountain but to the desert for further development after which they started to act together.

  The New Testament, to my mind, may be divided into two apostolic styles. One of them is like Jesus preached to the apostles – “Do not think when you will preach the Gospel”. But there were violators who recorded the above phrase (Mark 13, 11 and Luke 21, 14). Their narration style resembles witness testimony in character. If they did not violate this instruction of Jesus we would receive slight semblance of Jesus’s activities in the style of previous prophets: Isaiah, Malachi, etc. But they scrupulously described what Jesus actually said and did.

  In the result it is possible to assemble pretty good picture of his acts and sayings. He began with calling to himself several apostles and traveled with them over Israeli lands preaching much warmer relations than existing ones; and … he heeled people. I think that if he had only preached like preceding prophets he would not be able to gather so many people around him since all thick men wish to cure themselves. People attended his sermons not only to hear them but also to see the miraculous recoveries. Among those attending the Pharisees appeared and he, so to say, waged a war with them. A vivid example is the parable on vineyard (Mathew 21, 27). But apart from oral denunciation of Pharisees but spiting them he violates commandment in public and heels sick people on Saturdays and adds to that: “Not a man for Saturday, but a Saturday for a man”. His struggle with Pharisees is not only struggle with people , it is struggle with stereotypes of the thinking of the main mass of Israelites basing on language symbols and their combinations used by previous prophets that, in the final run, led to results unacceptable for N/C. That is exactly why the parables used by Jesus are more exact and seem much more intellectual than all the Old Testament records. These very parables are destructors of Old Testament dogmas, but, at the same time, basing in his sayings the Christian preachers created new dogmas owing to same stereotypical thinking. What’s to be done? Human mind often wish to make everything more simple and preconditioned.

  Therefore Jesus acquired many enemies among the rich part of Jewish society. While N/C covered his back nothing could threaten him; Jehovah protected Moses to the last moment exterminating a number of Israelites and burning down the upraised Levites.

  Apostles said nothing about the reasons why N/C abandoned his creation (Jesus Christ), we are left to make guesses: maybe he understood that he wouldn’t reach the desired result, or he had some other affair to attend to. In the result Jesus got in hands of the Pharisees and Caiaphas.

The only one who could and wished to save Jesus was a pagan Pontius Pilate but fearing an uprising and hence reduction of the tax collected and damage to his soldiers, he concedes to the Jews.

  As to Judas, to my mind he should not be called a traitor. His acts committed after the execution of Jesus are not usual for traitors. He returned those thirty talents and committed suicide. He may be called a careless fool. It is evident that he believed in omnipotence of Jesus and wished to find out what would become of collision of Jesus with Pharisees. Therefore when he heard from Jesus: “Do what you have come for” he ran to Pharisees evidently expecting interesting things to happen. His perception system failed to let him know that capabilities of Jesus depend on N/C behind his back and he was unable to perceive that N/C may step aside at the most unfavorable moment.

   Ministers of church have delivered us in understandable though distorted condition. They seem not to notice obligatory sacrifices though Jesus reminds about them (Mathew 5, 23 and Luke 5, 14). But, to my mind, there is no sense to make sacrifices so far from Jerusalem – they will not reach him, and other N/Cs may appear near alters.

  Omission of one more moment makes Christianity an international religion: Jesus makes clear difference between the Jews and other people. He defines it as a difference between one man’s children and dogs (Mathew 15, 22).

  In the result of shadowing of these moments by missioners and their activities among pagans Christianity dominates in many states of the Earth though these states are far away from the places where the events described in the Bible took place.

9. PURITY AS PER JEHOVAH

  Probably all peoples of the world have customs that could be called purifying. In their turn they could be subdivided into three parts with regard to the means used: 1 – water, 2 – fire, 3 – earth.

  1. Water as a purifying means is used practically by all peoples simultaneously against chemical and energy (metaphysical) dirt; there is no need to describe how it is used since modern town dwellers take a shower or a bath several times a week. The only people using water mainly for drinking are the habitants of the extreme North and most drying deserts.

  2. Fire and smoke, though used differently, are related to each other and may be regarded as one whole. Northern shamans though do not use water as a purifying means but compensate it by fire and smoke. Ancient Slavs used to jump over the fires, in Buddhist temples sandal sticks are smoking, and Christian priests are burning candles and swing smoking censers on any occasion. C.Castaneda’s books describe two cases of applying smoke for two different purposes. The first is the purification of luminescence. All disciples passed smoke baths and Castaneda himself was smoked several hundred times. These procedures are described in the book “The gift of the Eagle”, chapter 5. The second is the fight of nagual Julian, benefactor of Juan Matus, with N/C with the aid of smoke (“Fire from within” Chapter 6). This case of the application of smoke had a purpose coinciding with Biblical story of Levite mutiny and defeat of Israelites (Numbers 16). Both in case of Don Juan and in case of Aaron the necessary effect was reached with the help of smoke. Of course, this is not the only case of application of fire and smoke described in the Bible. It also narrates how pagans took their children through fire; Jews purified by fire the arms taken from pagans. 

  3. The earth or better say soil as a means of purification is used by shamans more rarely than the fire and the water. Soviet writer A.Efremov in his book “Razor Blade” described the means used in Hinduism tradition when a man is confined in a small cave for several days. And highly esteemed by me C.Castaneda relates hoe Juan Matus dug into ground his disciple Lahorda for several days to cure her fatal illness.

  The above-stated means of purification from energy dirt may be found in different books on magic, folk traditions and be substantially amended. But only in Bible I found recommendations how to avoid that dirt. Therefore, I’d wish to elaborate on recommendations of Biblical N/C  intended to strengthen psychic and physical health of Israelites. They may also be useful for the readers of this chapter.

  The first and foremost commandment is “Observe the day of Saturday”, it was obligatory for execution and its violation was punishable by death, therefore Israelites had to rest one day in each seven days. Observation of this commandment to my mind allowed to relax psychics, calmed down negative energy disturbances appearing during strained toil. Then followed directions about pure and impure animals and I draw your attention to the ending words “It is forbidden for you” (Leviticus 11). This forbidding resembles a usual experiment to me.

  But still more attention is paid to touching different dead bodies beginning with animals torn by animals and ending with the deceased people. A man that touched the corps was considered impure. To purify himself he was recommended to wash clothes and body with water and for some time (from one to seven days) to remain outside home.

  The utensils that became impure should be put in water and clay vessels are to be destroyed.

  Women are considered impure after giving birth until leaking stops. Likewise they are considered impure during menses and the men should not touch them.

  The strictest requirements to cleanliness were for high priest Aaron. Jehovah forebode him even to touch the deceased sons, and each time before entering the Tabernacle he was bound to wash his hands and feet (Exodus 30).

  And Levites and women of other tribes (pagans) that the Jews wished to marry were subject to very strict purification. Levites shaved all their bodies and washed clothing and the women additionally cut their nails and changed the whole clothings and were considered pure only in a month’s time by which they became marriageable.

  All sick persons were also considered impure. They were not likely to touch and priests dealt with the rest.

  The property seized from the pagans was to be purified: the inflammable – by fire and the flammable – by water. That is the fire had higher purifying properties than the water. Also as per N/C instructions a menorah was to burn in the temple all the time. It may be supposed that it was a kind of washer for N/C.

  By the moment Prophet Mohammed appeared the climate in the Middle East became dryer and there was not enough water for everybody wishing to purify oneself before the prayer an then he advices the believers to wash with pure sand (sura “Women”, ayat 46).

  To all the above advices of Jehovah pertaining to purity but other than given above it is possible to add the warning: do not wear cloths woven of different threads (Leviticus 19). I think that many people guess from their feelings that pure linen or cotton clothes is better than that made of different mixtures especially with synthetic materials added, and prefer to buy it.

 The use of the above rules and instructions improves any person’s health especially if he/she is over 40. And remembering the so-called “Pharaoh’s curse” the conviction appears that these rituals must have some solid background. Those who wish to have a mort thorough look at Jehovah’s advices may be referred to Leviticus beginning with chapter 11.

  As to the most efficient purification procedure the best to my mind judging by personal experience is the Russian bath in its “black” variant, preferably with change of clothes and dripping in ice hole. However it may not be often used and can not be used for long time; it should not be used when digging into the ground may help better. In other words, for each metaphysical dirt there must be its own purifying means.

8. RECIPE-BOOK OF N/C

                                                            "Love comes and goes, but hunger is eternal"                                                                                                                                                         Proverb

  At school at the lessons of biology the teacher told us: “All living creatures are devided into animate and inanimate; plants are inanimate and animals are animate. ".

  Then once I read that the plants are capable of recognizing people and even of getting sad and that somewhere in England a crime case was solved with the aid of detectors attached to the plant.

  And Juan Matus told C.Castaneda: “The luminescence of consciousness of the people and the animals are more like trees luminescence than that of insects”. And if Lazarev and Megre descriptions of human construction is added here, then it follows that everything from lichens to people has its own soul. And this soul is more diversified and rich than that what we percept like lichen or a man.

  Of course, a skeptic may retort to all the above: “Nonsence! And Castaneda, Lazarev, and Megre are just air-mongers and quite by chance described about the same but differently”. Though the skeptic himself make conclusions basing on his own limited perception.

  But in far seventies (if the memory does not fail me) some scientists and their voluntary aids that for the sake of the science chose to die not at home but on exact scales found out that at the moment of death human body becomes lighter by 1.5-2.5 grams. The learned scholars started to scratch their heads…

  But priests were gladdened by this fact: “Aha..! If the sole is proved to exist, then the God – our omnipotent Father – must also exist!” I want to make out what is the relation between God and soul (energy body).

  Teaching C.Castaneda, Juan Matus said: "The allies are attracted by emanations.  Most of all they are fond of bodily fear. When a creature experiences it, it emits energy of the type most suitable for allies. The inner emanations of the allies are fed by bodily fear energy ".

  Beginning with Moses and ending with Mohammed each of the prophets in this or that form called to fear God or just intimidated his listeners. One may suppose that intimidating was necessary to make people observe the covenant. But it may also be supposed that the prophets spoke being in close contact with N/C, i.e. it was behind him and governed his language. Therefore if listeners got frightened, any N/C whether reasonable or not would like it.

  In words of Don Juan the ancient seers frightened people to feed their allies.

  If the N/C physical bodies lack periodic elements, then the emotions generated by human bodies and emitting in space lack them too. Both in the first and in the second case the matter constituting N/C bodies and living creatures emanations have some resemblance. In both cases it is named as thin, and if we feed on combinations of chemical elements, our body consist of them too. It would be right to suppose that if N/C body consists of thin matter, its food would also be the same. But if food consists only of emotion emanations then their nourishment is too much uniform..

  C.Castaneda in his book “The fire within” (the chapter “Primary attention”) narrates how Don Juan acquaints him with practices of ancient magi who “challenged the death”. And he tells him how they decided the problem of feeding for long year ahead using for food thin (energy) bodies of people or animals frightened by them to death.

  Almost no literature has been preserved until now describing the rites of offerings (sacrifices) by Greeks, Romans, or other pagans. There were mentioning that before people sacrificed animals and even people to gods in ancient European and Buddhist literature. But I have not found any serious data on rituals and rules of sacrifices.

  Pentateuch was an exception. The necessary information in it commences with the story of Abel and Cain relating that God liked the lamb and disliked bread. It also contains exact schedule of offerings and rules for cattle choice.

  Simultaneously with the exodus of Israelites from Egypt Jehovah via Moses immediately gave instructions how to celebrate Easter and what should belong to the Lord (Exodus 12, 13). The instructions in these chapters look somewhat unfinished as compared with succeeding ones that Moses gave after he had twice spent 40 days face to face with N/C. Sufficiently attentive reading of Exodus give impression that due to multitude of sacrificed animals Israelites started to starve and grumble at Moses. In Bible all succeeding prophets referring to stated by Moses called for sacrifices. Only Mohammed gives a small but significant to my mind addition to these rules, but it will be dealt with later.

  The most detailed procedures of offering is given in Leviticus (chapters 1 to 6). Their elements though can be met in some chapters of Exodus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.

  In short, the following may be said on the procedures:

  Live animals (mainly 1-year old firstlings with no defects) minimum three times per day were led to the altar of the tabernacle, or were killed later in the temple, sometimes they were butchered, sometimes not, and then they were burnt. All these procedures were performed by high priest with the aid of sons and Levites.

  If, from the above-said it is clear that N/C received for food at least three souls (approximately about 5-8 grams of thin matter) at the moment of animals’ death, then what is fed during burning of corpses and flower with chrism?! It is probable, that during burning at the moment of accelerated destruction of bodies owing to chemical reaction that part of the thin matter commences to separate which remained with body after death (as per Lamaism it separates within 14 days), and flower with chrism during burning might serve as same components of food for us as pepper and mustard.

"Each day offer two yearling lambs upon the altar, one in the morning and the other in the evening. With one of them offer three quarts of finely ground flour mixed with 2 ½ pints of oil, pressed from olives; also 2 ½ pints of wine, as a libation. Offer the other lamb in the evening, along with flower and wine libation as in the morning, for a fragrant burnt-offering to the Lord. This shall be a perpetual daily offering at the door of the Tabernacle before the Lord, where I will meet you " (Exodus 29). Well, and apart from these two lambs there were offerings for sin, purification, heave-offering, etc.

Such daily feeding existed since the moment of Tabernacle erection and, probably, survived until now with intervals for wars. And if by the moment of Jesus Christ emergence this was a strictly observed norm, nowadays, most likely, the orthodox believers do not advertise their acts.

During flowering of the Jewish Kingdom up to 1,000 animals could be sacrificed at one time. The Jews wished to do it the best way, but imagine that you can not enter your own home being blocked by food reserves. Of course, Jehovah did not also like excessive diligence and declared via Prophet Isaiah in chapter 1: "I am sick of your sacrifices. Don’t bring me any more of them. I don’t want your fat ram I don’t want to see the blood from your offerings".

  Like a man that ate too much dislikes the smell and appearance of the food, so our N/C got annoyed by exuberant quantity of offerings due to excessive diligence of Israelites.

  As to the quality of animals used for offerings as per requirements prescribed in Leviticus, they are essentially the same as used in expensive restaurants but the latter do not completely meet them since managers have hardly read Leviticus. But connoisseurs being guided by taste and delicacy of meat would prefer the meat used for offerings to Jehovah to all other variants.

  The Bible contains the description of the two extreme of a kind deviations of sacrificing procedures when young people were sacrificed to the Lord of Sabaoth and he dis not object to it. In the first case it was the daughter of Jephthah (Judges 11), and in the second – the son of the King of Moab (2 Kings 3). And no refusals from human sacrifices followed. It may be supposed he liked its taste.

   After the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple by Roman conquerors in 70 A.D. the stable regime of sacrifices was seriously violated and not far away in a place reachable by N/C in Mecca near the house named Caaba where by Arabic legends was Ismail’s (Israel-Jacob’s) grave and where Arabs regularly sacrificed animals to different gods including Allah that they regarded and worshiped as the god of their distant predecessor. Probably these sacrifices had attracted N/C to this particular place and believing Ibn Hisham and those from whose words he compiled the description of life of the Prophet Mohammed N/C had tried to establish contact with people visiting Caaba and making sacrifices before Mohammed’s birth. And Prophet’s grandfather sacrificed 100 camels for the sake of his son and father of Mohammed.

     By words of Mohammed  himself and the people who witnessed about him in his life description, he often had conflicts with Israelites with regard to their violations of the commandments given via Moses. Later this confrontation transformed into the war. Anyhow, almost all Israelites not accepting Islam were ousted from their territories by Arabs.  Only in 20-th century the Jews managed to reestablish the state of Israel. And after 600 A,D. constant wars between the believers took place. Evidently, to facilitate the problem of his own nourishment during war-like activities of his believers of the new wave, N/C gave the following instruction to Mohammed: “Oh you who has believed! Do not violate neither forbidden month, nor sacrificed animals” (Sura  "Repast", ayat 2). "The carrion, pig’s blood and meat, and those not killed with the call to Allah are forbidden for you” (ayat 4). The Muslims most of all like the last line. Due to it there is no need in pompous offerings, it is sufficient to cry out well and inspirational “Alla-a-a-ah!” at the moment of slaughtering the animal. And let the omniscient Allah come and take his due and the meat will be eaten by a faithful Moslim.

In modern Islamic world this, at first sight unserious sacrifice, reached amazing scale. About one and half billion people are directly or indirectly involved in it and live rams are bought in other countries and are carried to the Miggle East by the time of Moslim festivities. Following this procedure none of the faithful is threatened to become a vegetarian. As to N/C proper, he does not eat meat and when he gets hungry it is sufficient to listen whether somebody is yelling “Alla-a-a-ah!”

In contemporary civilized world sacrifices are regarded as savage barbaric custom. But it follows from all the abovesaid that it s not so and the Middle East and its Moslim suburbs is the only place in the world where animals are sacrificed in different ways described in Leviticus and Qur’an.  

If it is more or less clear with sacrifices why then N/C needed emotion emanations? Just imagine, you are bored with your life and on a holiday you go to the church to pray for mercy, but going through the market place you notice a thing you’ve long been dreaming to have. In this case your prayer will hardly be sufficiently emotionally saturated. Your desire for that thing will distract you from prayer. That is why Jesus Christ made a smash-up for traders and money-changers settled near the Tempe. And Mohammed having conquered Mecca upon coming to Caaba broke and threw away all hand-made objects that appeared in his absence.   

Mohammed attributed serious meaning to the prayer. As per his life description Jabrail (Angel) taught him how to purify oneself and how to pray. This bioenergy information was interpreted in quantitative instructions. These are: four prayers in sedentary and two in traveling mode of life. In my view his quantitative interpretation of the praying for N/C is a mistake due to imprints of perception. In the end of his life he makes a more correct step and leaves to lead praying (i.e. successor after his death) Abu-Bakr that had no other prominent qualities but one: he often wept reading Qur’an i.e. was very emotional and that could attract N/C and later on N/C would arrange everything himself.

Jesus Christ compares two prayers: Иисус Христос на этот счет дает сравнение двух молитв: “Two men went to the Temple to pray. One was a proud, self-righteous Pharisee, and the other a cheating tax collector. The proud Pharisee 'prayed' this prayer: 'Thank God, I am not a sinner like everyone else, especially like that tax collector over there! For I never cheat, I don't commit adultery, 1 go without food twice a week, and I give to God a tenth of everything I earn.'  "But the corrupt tax collector stood at a distance and dared not even lift his eyes to heaven as he prayed, but beat upon his chest in sorrow, exclaiming, 'God, be merci­ful to me, a sinner." I tell you, this sinner, not the Pharisee, returned home forgiven! For the proud shall be humbled, but the humble shall be honored" (Luke 18). It follows from this elucidation that for N/C that the emotional tax collector is more pleasant for him than the Pharisee.

If any of you, esteemed readers, has seen video-record “Merciful fire in the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem” he/she would certainly notice mass of emotional people, some of them crying or otherwise expressing their emotions, and Patriarch Diodor took off clothes embroidered in gold so that they wouldn’t hinder to emit emotions in space.  Frantic prayer once a year always results in burning of fire. And frantic prayers four times a day are just impossible to my mind. That is what made N/C change the place of its presence that is to settle at the Temple or may be periodically visit it to the envy of the Hebrew and Moslims 

Despite all the above-said I shall obstain from certain conclusions as to the meaning of the emotions for N/C; one thing is clear – he needs it. Maybe it is comparable with dog’s enjoying scratching by the master, or warming near the bonfire.

7. TRACES OF THE DRAGON

They say in the East that it is impossible to find a trace of a fish in the water same as it is impossible to find a man’s trace in a woman. Nothing can be asserted exactly and for sure, but at the same time guesses are almost always correct. Therefore, following the logics, the three Middle-East religions are called Abrahamic by scholars.

The traces of the bio-ether creature are to be searched for in literature witnessing of it: Bible, Gospel, Qur’an and in the description of the life of Mohammed; some of these traces may be found in the Middle East even nowadays. Though the behavior of the reasonable live creature can not be stable (dolphin trainers assert that even these highly intellectual animals dislike to perform same tricks for long time), nevertheless, some of his characteristics and mode of action, like those of a man, are preserved within a life time. In this chapter I want to sort them as per the order in which they are mentioned in Bible.

1.      Telepathic impact on people.

          Trusting Moses not only as a witness of the events during his lifetime, but also as a scrupulous narrator of everything his tribesmen told him, it seems that Abraham, Jacob, and Josef were most likely real and not fabulous people some of the first to contact with N/C. BBC creators of the film “Jacob” bring sufficiently serious arguments in favor of the story of the settlement of the first Israelites in Egypt not being fictional. I have sufficiently thoroughly described further contacts including prophet Mohammed in the chapter “Prophets”. I have scrappy knowledge that N/C even after Mohammed’s death tried “ to create prophets of himself” but original sources I could refer to are lacking as yet.

2.      Telepathic impact on animals.

The first traces of telepathic impact on animals are met in Exodus among the ten plagues of Egypt: “Aaron stretched his hand over waters of Egypt and frogs came out and covered the land of Egypt” (Exodus 8). Then moths, flies, and locust followed. Then follows adventures with the famous Balaam's ass that would not listen to her master (Numbers 22). Old Testament also mentions lions acting as per God’s will: “and told him because you do not listen to the voice of the Lord, the lion will kill you when you will leave me. He left Him and the lion met him and killed him. (1 Kings 20). "My God has sent his angel to shut the lions’ mouths” (Daniel 6). In other cases the prophets as a rule used animals to intimidate their tribesmen.

New Testament mentions only one case when in order to strengthen Jesus Christ authority before his disciples the herd of pigs dashed down from the cliff.

And in the description of the life of Prophet Mohammed three cases of telepathic impact on animals are mentioned: on elephant, on hoarse, and on camel. The most exemplary is the case with the elephant brought by Ethiopian king Abrahat to destroy Caaba near which at that time N/C dwelt: “The elephant was hit by the iron rod over head to urge him to stand up. The elephant refused. They stuck a stick with a hook in groin and tickled him to urge him to stand up. He refused. And when urged to go to Yemen side, he stood up and ran. When urged ton Syria side he also ran. When urged to the East he ran too. But guided back to Mecca he lowered on his knees. And Allah sent birds on them looking like swallows and seagulls. Each bird carried three stones with it: one in a beak and two in pawns of a peanut and lentil size. When a stone hit any of them, he immediately fell dead. But not everybody was reached.

And they went away falling dead all way long. They died everywhere near each water-hole" (Hisham,  chapter "An attempt to turn off Arabs from Mecca”).

Despite the above fantastic-looking description the fact remains the fact – the elephant turned back and the troops retreated. The imprinted perception might have taken the big amount of “energy” hanging over the troops for birds.

Such frequent and stable impact on animals is explainable by their higher sensitivity to bio-energy than that of an ordinary man.

3.      Fire trace.

This trace is often signified in scriptures  by the language symbol of fire though actually it should be separated into two parts often appearing together. The first part is bluish luminiscens like from electrostatic discharge, and the second part is ignition of objects. In texts luminance is met more frequently than the ignition of objects, lamps, etc. This trace is definitely observed from Israelites exodus from Egypt until nowadays i.e. within over 3,000 years.

In the Old Testament this trace is most often met in Pentateuch, especially in Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers, that is quite logical since it had been essential to mark out His presence at the initial stage of “breeding” of Israelites and to demonstrate His capacities to persuade those who doubt. ”Then the fire came from the Lord and consumed the burnt offering and fat on the altar; and when the people saw it, they all shouted and fell flat upon the ground before the Lord" (Leviticus 9).

The fire that hit Aaron’s sons was of the other kind since their clothes were preserved, then the camp was caught by fire (chapter 11), and only censers being made of brass remained from the rebellious Levites (chapter 16). Then the offerings were burnt of Gideon (Judges 6), twice of Elijah (1 Kings 18, 19) and after commissioning of King Solomon’s temple (2 Chronicles 7), etc.

The New Testament does not mention fire. To my mind it was due to short interaction of Jesus Christ and N/C that the fire was not remembered.

Then it is mentioned twice in the description of the life of Prophet Mohammed. “And the fire came to them. When the fire turned to their side they stepped aside being afraid of Him. The people present started to urge them and required to endure it. They stood in their place until fire reached them. The fire devoured idols and everything near them as well as those Himyaritswho carried these all. And two Judaic priests came out with scrolls on their necks, the sweat was running over their foreheads. They were not hurt by the fire (Chapter: Tuba calls Yemen to its faith).

The first Russian pilgrim that visited Holy Land in 12-th century also saw light. In 1580 Orthodox Patriarch was not allowed into the Holy Sepulchre and remained praying near the column by the entrance. An electric discharge split the column and lit Patriarch‘s candle. Nowadays  each Holy Saturday, i.e. on Easter, the light comes down on the bed of Jesus Christ and Patriarch Deodar accepts “gracious fire”. That’s what priest Vladimir, a pilgrim from Moscow writes: “Bluish shining flashes look like small lightning discharges”. He also marks out that the first one whose candle lit in the hall was a young Arab belonging to Orthodox church one of the very emotional group of non-traditional behavior from our image of Christian believers behavior.

Such events take place not only on Easter. E.g. the monk Panteleimon saw flashes of light during ten days beginning with June 28, 1994 in the dim of the temple. And St. John of Damask said that the Holy Sepulchre lightens each day but it becomes obvious for everybody on Holy Saturday. I admit that while watching the tape-recording I could not make out when and per which calendar this Saturday occurs.

4.      Cloud trace.

This trace, same as fire trace is often met in records pertaining to all three Abrahamic religions and is well-noticeable nowadays in TV broadcasts from the Holy Land. Cloud trace is often mentioned alongside with fire trace as it refers to the wish of N/C to manifest its presence. It is many times mentioned in the Old Testament, one time – in New Testament, and twice in the description of the life of Prophet Mohammed.

"Then the glory of the Lord rose from above the cherubim and went over to the door of the Temple. The Temple was filled with the cloud of glory, and the court of the Temple was filled with the brightness of the glory of the Lord " (Ezekiel 10).

"But even as he was saying this, a bright cloud formed above them; and terror gripped them as it covered them. And the voice from the cloud said, “This is my Son, my Chosen One, listen to him (Luke 9(36)).

For us the word “cloud” means a definite atmospheric phenomenon. But for a loud to come out of cherubim and to fill in the temple?.. And some voices sounding from it?.. Looks like a tale too much. But, to my mind, the Israelites simply lacked a more suitable word to denote that bio-energy (ether) plasmoid penetrating through any defense and passing through all filters of human perception.

One of the Islam adepts evidencing N/C signified this phenomenon as a “storm-cloud” that is a bit nearer to the truth since the storm-cloud has serious electrostatic charge.

And here’s what one nun says about her “vision” (video-record about gracious fire, 1995): “Through the hole above something like ball comes down… a blinking cloud”.

Of coarse, it is impossible to assert that 100% of mentionings about the “cloud” whitness about N/C emergence. Nowadays TV broadcasts from the Holy Land sometimes inform of lighting the fire with previous appearance of the cloud. Such occasions happened not only near the Holy Sepulchre and not only on Easter that could evidence the capability of N/C for movement.

Despite all the above-said I dare suppose that the “reasonable” N/C possesses capacity of gathering water vapors by its “body” and thus becoming visible and that some people meeting N/C actually saw a cloud.

5.      Wind.

This trace is most difficult for specific defining since winds tend to blow on their own and all cases described might be just co-incidences. Nevertheless, I draw your attention to some of them.

"…and a strong east wind blew all that night, drying the sea bottom " (Exodus 14). This was the first and very serious aid of God to His Chosen People described in the Old Testament and that could have actually happened. BBC creators of the film “Moses” say that due to translators a shallow narrow rushy gulf not exceeding two meters in depth could be called a sea. And this means that the described event can be moved from fantastic to real events range.

"They rushed over and woke him up. “Master, Master, we are sinking!” they screamed. So he spoke to the storm: “Quiet down”, he said; and the wind and waves subsided and all was calm” (Luke 8).

If the wind helped Moses and Mohammed to avoid death, the miracles of Jesus Christ “worked” for the prestige he needed so much.

In the description of the life of Prophet Mohammed the wind interferes twice: first, prior to Mohammed’s birth, the wind, in response to the prayer of the Christian Faimiun whose house had been often lit without a lamp, tears away with roots the palm tree – the object of worship of the pagans. The second time was during the siege of the Prophet and his fellows in arms in Medina by enemies: “Allah sent strong wind and cold nights on them. The wind turned over their pots and tents” (chapter: Battle by the trench).

This is the last information on the wind useful for the believers and harmful for the pagans.

6. PROPHETS

- Ah, - smiled Chapayev, - that’s what you are talking about. You kmow, Peter, when you talk to mass of people it is the least important whether you munderstand yourself the words you pronounce. It is important that others would understand them. You have only to reflect the crowd’s expectations. Some achive it by studying language the crowd speak, but I’d rather act directly. So if you wish to understand what “zaruka” is you should ask not me, but those standing at the square now.

V.Pelevin "Chapayev and emptiness"

Communicative connections both between the given people and within socium play great role. It is appropriate to regard the outcoming information as primary, i.e. more important part of communication in general. In its turn, the outcoming information may be divided into two parts:

Signwise information: speech, mimics, gestures, poses – in general, everything that bear specific meaning and psychological sense.  

Signless information: energy component – immediate psychic messages transmitted via bioenergetic contact.

The receipt of such information is called “biotelelocation”. In nature this phenomenon is mostly developed by fishes living in muddy waters of big rivers and it helps them not only to find food, but, what’s most important, to preserve population.

Many things could be said about telepathy and hypnosis and leading role of bioenergetic component in the process of communication and interaction between people, animals, and between people and animals. The main thing, to my mind, is that all these processes take place in the area of subconsciousness.

The group of Russian scientists under guidance of Prof. N.M. Livanov has experimentally proved (experiments being conducted with mice, rabbits and human volunteers) that during  telepathic communication session inductor’s brain emits and recipient’s brain receives modulated electromagnetic modes of 10^-27 watt power, frequency 10 hertz,  and [transmission] speed 10 bit/sec. it has been also established that the brain is immediately affected by both constant electromagnetic field and low-frequency electromagnetic oscillations.

   If in the above sentence words “inductor’s brain” are substituted for “N/C’s inductive tool”  and the word “recipient” is substituted by “the Prophet”, then this assertion of Russian scientists helps much with the analysis of biblical texts.  

  Initially the word Prophet was purely Hebraic and after Islam appeared it became general Semitic.

  In connection with all the above-said the role of prophets in Biblical events may mainly be determined as a communication key or biological mechanism intended to transfer outgoing signless information from N/C into signwise human perceptible information. And N/C established feedback from the prophets and analisis of current events. Once more I dare assert that a prayer  is a very important component in the process of communication between God and the believers. He can judge and analyze correctness of choice of the “key” (prophet) by emotional (energy) component of the prayer and number of inductors (those praying).          

    I am deeply convicted that there were very many prophets in the “Promised Land”. At least much more than in the registered records. But only three of them had been chosen by N/C for the cardinal changes of the controlled situation in Israeli society.

  Moses was the first of them not resembling any of the succeeding prophets. Probably because as he, himself, put it was not much of a talker hence, most likely, he was thoughtful and therefore fit for implementation of the most complex and large-scale affairs necessary for the breeding of the people chosen by N/C - Israelites. And N/C promised him to help to speak well (Exodus, 4). But how could he squeeze all necessary information related by Moses in Pentateuch  N/C having no language in our understanding. It seems to me that for that very purpose he isolated Moses two times on the mountain for 40 days. What and how was going on there for me personally remains an insolvable question. One thing is clear – it was a serious treatment. One can not say that Moses became talkative after that, but everything he said was to the point. It seems to me that this treatment had not only imbedded the necessary information in Moses’s head and made him contactable with N/C but also made him at least partially “enlighted” using the Yogi term. This is supported not only by thoroughly written harmonious code of behavior for his tribe but also by the event when he had no communication with N/C and nobody to consult with.    

  This event took place the day succeeding the day of Levite uprising (Numbers, 16) when N/C enraged by permanent discontent of Israelites decided to eliminate everybody except Aaron and Moses. In this situation Moses adopted the solely correct decision to save his co-tribesmen and sent Aaron with the burning cense into midst of Israelites. Clad in protective clothes he was impregnable for N/C and the censor is good against any devildom. Somehow or other but Aaron managed to save part of Israelites. And though Jehovah’s rage diminished he kept up a grudge against Aaron and, most likely, contributed to Aaron’s death on the Mount Hor when Aaron undressed (Numbers, 20). And Moses lived until 120 keeping contact with Jehovah.

  The succeeding Old Testament prophets unlike Moses were sufficiently talkative and used to pep talk like popular Russian literary heroes: Chapayev of Pelevin at the meeting, or con-man Ostap Bender arranging chess tournament (with vaguest impression on chess playing) in Vasyuki village to raise money.  Many of the prophets often observed fasts to feel better the wishes of N/C. Evidently they did not undergo the treatment applied to Moses excluding Elijah. “So he got up and ate and drank and the food gave him enough strength to travel forty days and forty nights to Mount Horeb, the mountain of God, where he lived in a cave” (1 Kings, 19).  There are no other evidences of 40-days fasts of other prophets and they are similar to each other like twins. A number of them are mentioned in the Bible. There are whole books devoted to them named after them. After Moses there were Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hesea, Amos, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, and Ezra.

  All the above-mentioned prophets are united by many traces. All of them spoke without thinking (connection of subconsciousness with vocal apparatus) as a rule they did not practice healing, miracles, did not add or modify commandments, spoke to solve specific problem, and to glorify Jehovah, and to terrify the believers. Mainly owing to these prophets the myth was created that Lord Sabaoth created earth and people and that he is an omnipotent transcendental creature. This happened because in childhood all of us wished the mother to be most beautiful and the father to be the strongest. Many having grown older retained this childish wish. And words of these prophets found fertile soil in their consciousness. And their God became the most, most, utmost…

  In the period between King Solomon rule and Jesus Christ emergence they had been serving N/C like dogs to a herdsman keeping herd together following the route.

The last two of them warn the Israelites of the emergence of a serious prophet in future (Zechariah, 9, 3 Ezra, 7). For those who had read Maccabees and Gospel it is evident that Israelite tribe deviated from the course desirable by N/C.

  Such was the situation preceding the emergence of Jesus Christ. I think that owing to his personal qualities he revealed himself as a prophet often using parables exactly describing situations. None of the preceding prophets possessed such poetic language and he had very strong connection with N/C. Even Moses did not have such strong connection though he conducted not one but two 40-days bilateral sessions with Jehovah.

  In this connection regarding his Immaculate Conception I can only say: “Inscrutable are the capabilities of the reasonable N/C ".

  Jesus himself said about this connectin: “I am the one with my heavenly Father”. At the same time when someone addresses his as good he retorts: “When you call me good you are calling me God … for God alone is truly good” (Mathew, 19). Analysing these and other words of Jesus and his capability to work miracles, it might be said that his energy ties with N/C during his enterprises was as tight as that between a marionette and a puppeteer during the show. But if previous marionettes (prophets) had some two-three strings pulled by the puppeteer, Jesus, to my mind, had about ten strings and was fully entitled to assert his unity with Jehovah simultaneously making difference between himself and Jehovah. Naturally such strong ties could not last long and they broke when Jesus’s conflict with Pharisees reached its culmination.

  As is obvious from further events in the Middle East the results of cooperation with Jesus Christ did not satisfy N/C, did not ensue reaching the desired state by congregation (Israelites) and the situation was as follows: in the center the Pharisees rallied round the Temple.   They made regular sacrifices strictly observes commandments, they were materially rich, but emotionally poor. And in the rimland Christian communities emerged. Orthodox Jews disliked them and tried to get rid of them and they fled away to other lands, to pagans.

  To my mind, having analyzed his failures and needs, N/C took decision not to get tied to one place (temple) and to one people (Jews). Even before Jesus Christ he had threatened via prophet Ezra to leave the Jews for pagans (Ezra 3, 1). And he had also decided to appeal not to human reason but to perception. Therefore short, rigid, threatening ayats pontificated by Mohammed are samewise effective for psychics as lashes for a body. But Mohammed’s mission was not only to duly affect  human psychics and to frighten them but also to renew mode of N/C feeding, to amend Torah laws (Pentateuch) regulating sexual relations, interrelations of the believers, and attitude to non-believers.

  In all the rest (apart from higher aggressiveness of utterances) Mohammed resembles a usual Old Testament prophet. Such was my impression from reading Qur’an.

  We are now having a great volume of significant information from N/C in the form of books written by prophets. But, as Juan Matus put it, “The weak side of the words is that they make us think we are informed” (C.Castaneda “Tales of the Force”). Therefore, after this information penetrates into human society, there appears contradiction between the symbolic information already rooted in consciousness  ensuing archetypes in collective unconscious of the believers on the one hand, and new incoming bio-energy information as interpreted by prophets from the other side. Therefore, since the time Pentateuch appeared and the first interpreters emerged all subsequent prophets had conflicts with such interpreters and almost always prophets suffered. Israelites stoned them, Christians would not listen, and Muslims cut their heads off. The prophets were mainly opposed by people with stable “primary attention” and high position in society. By the moment Jesus Christ appeared they had formed the whole class in Israeli society that Jesus called   scribers and Pharisees. These people had serious “energy shields” and N/C did not recruit interpreters among them since they were difficult to contact with and he addressed more energy-unstable, emotional and hence more contactable personalities among people with lower income. Jesus Christ purporting to clarify this situation said: “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God” (Mathew 19).

  Egoism inherent both to the rich and the poor had always been contributing to erecting obstructions in the mind of the first preventing them from accepting prophets from the poorer medium. This situation is sufficiently easily traced in Gospel and Life of prophet Mohammed best of all percepted by the poorer pagans. At that time they were still believing in several gods though they regarded themselves as Semites and worshiped Allah as one of the gods inherited by them from their distant predecessor Ishmael. The Turkish fortress Ishmael was named in his honor.

  Lest of all Mohammed succeeded in converting Jews and Christians versed in Torah and Gospel to Islam i.e. making them believe he was a prophet of that same God. Same was true for Christianity where the number of Israelites and former pagans elsewhere is just incomparable.

  But the story about prophets would not be complete without people usually not recognized as prophets; first of all those are the first kings: Saul, David, and Solomon. They had contacted with N/C despite existence of other prophets in their time, and even Mohammed dares to name David and Solomon prophets. More or less prophets, in this sense, are those in Bible who are described to contact God or Angels. Evidently bio-energy pressure on prophets might have exceeded 10^-27 watt stated in the beginning of the chapter since in retort to prophet Jeremiah N/C said: “Don’t say that [you are too young] for you will go wherever I will send you and speak whatever I tell you to. And don’t be afraid of the people, for I, the Lord, will be with you and see you through” Jeremiah 1).

And the last group of personages that might sooner be called ardent preachers and not prophets are the believers living outside the reach of N/C having made pilgrimage to Jerusalem during N/C activity periods and having received a charge of “heavenly spirit”. In the result they drastically changed their lives in favor of propaganda. A vivid example of such case is “father” Vissarion. They say, having returned from Jerusalem he proclaimed himself Jesus Christ at immigration control. Later he developed such activity that even arranged quite big community of his followers in Minusinsk suburb.

As it seems to me, in all times it is possible to find those who attributed great meaning to words because unusual language symbols spellbind the listener. Therefore talkative people are fond of using newly coined words mainly of foreign and scientific origin that could easily be substituted for a couple or more native words easily understood by their listener. But in this case the feeling of self-importance remains without excited alien glance, in the result such situations multiply language symbols as signifying something substantial and theoretically possible like those as well with nothing but illusions behind them. Practically these last words (symbols) are mainly intended to support bio-energy set of the outgoing information. Therefore many psychologists and just clever watchful observers understand that for very many people during communication the words are just reflections of their emotional conditions and do not carry any notional charge mainly negative or positive. Therefore G.Danelia in his film “Kin-Dza-Dza” that was a cult film of my generation substituted all words of alien heroes by two quasi-words only. Therefore,  it remains for me, basing on everything above-said to give a fair advice to everybody acquainted with Biblical history and proceedings of other myth-constructors: “Koo-oo- oo…!” 

5. PERCEPTION SYSTEM

We are percepting. That is an exactly established fact, but that what exactly we percept is not the equally established unequivocal fact. For we learn what to percept and how to percept.

                           C.Castaneda “Fire from within”

To my mind main mass of people especially those living in the developed countries are absolutely sure that the world is exactly that what they percept. Juan Matus said, - “Our time is distinguished by dominating primary attention and increased self-importance feeling”. And only at the moment of death the picture of the world begins to change rapidly. As a rule it causes panic in dying man’s consciousness. But there’s also a category of people who had experienced themselves different stated of the changed consciousness and some of them learned to control these states and became yogis, extra-senses, shamans, etc. for the sake of justice it should be noted that many of them submerging into the changed states percepted nothing but their own inner world. And those with often spontaneous changes of perception became in better cases the psychic patients. Among my acquaintances there are people who sufficiently soberly regard the world as differing from our perception basing on knowledge and observations. This chapter pretends to regard the limitations and actualization of the perception system from their point of view.                                    Contemporary science divide all human perception into five parts: senses of hearing, sight,  smell, taste, and touch. With the aid of hearing and sight a man can detect and prevent an attack on him whether on the part of gnat or tiger. Owing to smell he can escape a place where he may suffocate or find something edible. Thanks to touch he can avoid hot or thorned objects. And taste helps to distinguish between edible and inedible food.  These five senses help human beings and other animals orient and survive in this world until now.

But there are cases when human perception fails. The taste may fail to detect man-made poisons not met in the environment. The touch can not whether the wire is hot. Sense of smell does not distinguish many dangerous gases (e.g. natural gas).  The range of frequencies percepted by the ear is also limited. As to the eyesight – the main human sense of perception that accounts for about 90% of the information received by us – it also fails to register many things. I’d wish to puzzle out why and how this happens?

E.g. we all use phrase “I saw light”, but we cannot distinguish a beam of powerful searchlight from sunlight at daytime. Why this happens?

Via Indian yogis the notion of the “third eye” spread all over the Earth. This “eye” is considered to be located in the front area of brain a little above brows exactly where Indians draw a spot on the forehead. A man whose “third eye” is constantly open or capable of opening and closing it may see much more than an average man. These people see the so-called auras, astral bodies, energy entities, human emotional background of different colors, etc. To my mind this part of brain can hardly be named an eye since by its function from radio-technical point of view it resembles analyzer filter. Our eyes via eye-lens are percepting on retinae the whole light flow and the brain retains information  only on substances composed of periodic elements table excluding gas-like and small volume (several molecules). At night-time our eyes’ diaphragms are maximally open and we can notice a beam of light of a lantern or a search-light though it’s only dust or mist reflecting light. But with such opening of the diaphragm more favorable conditions are created for the perception of the “other” light-like matter because the filter (third eye) works at maximum of its capacity. Therefore a number of legends on devildom, gnomes, elves, etc. appearing chiefly at night-time circulate.  

  When teachers of yoga fail to fail to open “the third eye” of their disciples some of them perform a kind of a surgical operation on that sphere of brain and damage the filter. After it the disciples (patients) commence to percept the world in a different way. Yogi literature describe such operations. 

  Once in the autumn while walking through wood in a small company we had stopped to have a rest on a log. In some three minutes four young deers of a big dog’s size emerged from the bushwhack.

  - Hares, - exclaimed the girl who saw a hare a month ago.

  - Wolves, - whispered the guy who saw a couple of wolves in May.

  Meanwhile the deers approached us by about ten meters, sniffed the air, and fled having felt our presence. In this case different people identified differently one and the same material object and I witnessed perception imprints’ influence. Had the deers not approached so near my friends would persist in their opinions.

  So how to interpret that the Christians see Virgin Mary and Jesus Christ, atheists see aliens or luminescent objects, Hiduists see Asurs and Rakshases, and Moslims may see nobody but Allah.

 So it turns out that practically the system a man was brought up in determines seeing the archetype, using Karl Jung term, of the given system.

  But what was the basis for their seeing? They could not all be lying, especially the believers. Juan Matus told Carlos Castaneda on this matter: “Human ryes are designated to perform two functions: one of them being to see energy flows of the Universe and the other – to look at the things of this world”.

If such language symbol as “energy” allows for substitution for the symbol of “ether”, then such wide-spread notion as “bioenergetics” may empirically be widened and in this case it comes out that bioenergetics’ entities or, it may be said, bio-ether creatures serves the basis for seeing by the believers. Fast and prayer promote shifting of perception.

"- But if these creatures are really live why people do not hear a peep from them? – asked.

- They do make it. All the time. They challenge not only those who can see, but common people as well. The matter is that practically all energy available for a common man is consumed by the primary attention. Inventarization not only absorbs it completely but also solidifies cocoon making it less flexible. Interaction in such situation is impossible” (C.Castaneda “Fire from within”).

Basing on all above-said I dare suppose that bio-ether form of life, i.e. N/C residing in the Middle East understood in its time that human perception system under its usual conditions is incapable of percepting it. Therefore it undertook and has been undertaking until now the attempts to prove its existence, most often by a cloud, luminescence, and fire ignition of fire. "On the morning of the third day there was a terrible thunder and lightning storm, and a huge cloud came down upon the mountain, and there was a long, loud blast as from a ram’s horn, and all the people trembled". (Exodus, 19) 

  Any live creature known to contemporary science possesses a certain perception system necessary for its environment, mode of life and nourishment. Animalcules have a weakly developed perception system but more complex creatures have more intricate perception systems. And though many consider a man to be “the crown of nature” his system of perception is not the best by many indexes and the difference with other animals may be great.

  As to eyesight resolving power birds, especially birds of prey, exceeded all others, bats are incomparable in echolocation, predation mammals – in smell capacity, and dolphins – in hydrolocation and ultrasonic communication over several kilometers.

  In other words, each specie’s system of perception is sufficient for the preservation given population and separate creatures with failing system of perception either become somebody’s prey, or die from hunger, and only species with good perception die mainly from the old age.

  As to usual creatures dwelling on our planet contemporary biology at present sufficiently studied their perception, but that cannot be said about N/C.

  Most data on N/Customer are supplied by C.Castaneda on behalf of Juan Matus in the book “Fire from within”, chapter 6 “Non-organic creatures”. It follows from all said by Don Juan that at minimum N/C are capable to percept human emotions and sounds generated by us. It is supported by shamans’ practical acts and use of different ‘spirit-catchers” producing different vibrating sounds (mainly low-frequency vibrations). Though different N/C may have different perception, cf. gold bells on Aaron’s clothes that were sure to produce high-frequency sounds. And contemporary Moslim is forbidden to eat the meat of animals killed without the call “Alla…a…a…”. And if Don Juan’s  allies lost a man from sight (or just lost interest to him) when he calmed down his emotions and concentrated on something (in such condition a man for them is same as a rock for a man without either pick, or dynamite),  Jehovah without ceremony interfered in the dream of a sleeping man and contacted those awake too. Such cases in the Bible are explained mainly as appearance of God’s Angels. And though, at the first sight, his system of perception is the same as that of Toltek’s allies(perception of emotions and reaction to sounds) it seems to me that actually it is more refined and wide. Basing on directions on sacrifices and death of all first-begotten in Egypt it can tell a firstling animal or first-begotten man from all others. And wherefrom is such disgust: “You may also build altars from stone, but if you do, then use only uncut stones and boulders. Don’t chip or shape the stones with a tool, for that would make them unfit for my altar”. (Exodus, 20) I recall in this respect Sufi sayings about “traces of fish in water and bumblebee in the air”. It well may be that he percepts them. And, of course, there is purpose for his demand to pray only to him and not to distract with any images during prayer. He constantly tries to draw attention to himself during the prayer and otherwise. It all began with Moses’s commandment “You shall not make yourselves any idols”. Afterwards all prophets reminded about it in different words, and Muhammad totally forbade imaging of people and animals. The sacred fire is lit on Easter within the Holy Sepulchre where there are no paintings or sculptures. I am distracted with one question in this respect: what actually happens during concentration on the prayer to him and what for he needs it?

  Presumptions.

1. He is capable to see everybody praying at some distance and this is the way to estimate the condition of his congregation.

2. Feeling of great amounts of correctly praying people satisfies his feeling of self-importance.

3. This is one more variety of his nourishment provided the prayers are sufficiently emotional.

Even if the above presumptions are not correct there must be something what he needs them for. Otherwise, why does he constantly concentrate attention via prophets on prayers to him only.

And when a man paints icons, make sculptures, draw ornaments on their religious constructions to please the sight – their main perception organ, the prophets by different sayings hint that this is wrong. There is difference between concentrated prayer condition and gaping at ornaments or sculptures and paintings. And this difference is percepted by Jehovah. Here’s what Don Juan said in this respect: "The allies are attracted solely by energy released by emotions. It doe not matter whether this is love, hatred, or sorrow, - all of them work similarly efficiently".

Of course I would not dare assert or even surmise how he percepts us, people. May be like we percept each other, or like energy entities, or more complicated than all Yogi and shaman descriptions of energy structure visions taken altogether. One thing is clear: our perception system in ordinary state can not detect him, and his system detects us pretty well that enabled him to get engaged in human breeding for personal purposes.

Lately mass media often use such notions as “imaginary reality”, virtual reality”, “parallel worlds”. It would be interesting to understand from the point of view of worms living in my orchard whether I exist for them in any reality. I think they know nothing about me prior to digging of the orchard. Because when I watch them slithering on the ground they do not react to my presence. Their system of perception does not allow them to detect me. But during digging of the ground when many of them are cut by spade and I take a couple of them to show my young daughter what would they decide if they had reason after discussing between themselves all they felt: sharp spade, warm hands and upturned ground?  

  But we are people. And things imperceptible by our eyes may be perceived by our reason. Copernicus and Galileo perceived by their reason that the Earth is round and not flat. Lomonosov understood that in chemical reactions mass is not lost. Ampere found the way to measure electric current. And Popov found application for radio waves. Of course, now there are plenty of devices using different wave processes. But, nevertheless, they remain imperceptible. But it does not stop human reason. It thinks out new technical devices and uses other kinds of matter imperceptible by the five receptors.